Editor:
Every day that passed gave Shannon Miranda additional time to change his story, create new explanations and attempt to cover up what many of us have long suspected.
Finding eight dogs buried in a hole should not be viewed as an isolated incident. It raises serious questions about how many more animals may have suffered a similar fate over the years. The public deserves a thorough investigation, not carefully crafted excuses.
As someone who has been involved in animal rescue for nearly three decades, I know firsthand how difficult it is to place animals into safe, loving homes. Shelters are overflowing and large dogs are being euthanized by the thousands due to a lack of adopters. It is difficult to understand how Miranda’s Rescue was consistently finding homes for so many animals in such short periods of time. Where are the records? Where is the documentation? Where are the adopters?
My organization personally sent two dogs to Miranda’s Rescue. Within 30 days, we were told they would be euthanized because they were allegedly aggressive and biting employees. These dogs had a large network of volunteers closely following their progress. We immediately arranged for their return, and a volunteer transported them back to us the very next day.
Investigators and journalists should speak with former employees, volunteers, transporters and others who witnessed operations behind the scenes. Those voices may provide the truth.
The county has a responsibility to fully investigate these allegations and follow the evidence wherever it leads. If wrongdoing is found, those responsible should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
The animals deserved better. The public deserves the truth. As rescuers, we are humiliated and heartbroken by what has been uncovered. True rescue is built on love, compassion, accountability and a commitment to protecting animals.
Margo Cassidy, Napa
This article appears in Miranda’s Rescue Under Scrutiny, Part 2.
